ETF Foundry Research (hypothetical) · rebalanced monthly
Every other metric on this page is the long-shortstrategy, which needs a short book. This fund is the long leg alone, so these are the figures for what it actually holds. The bottom-bucket number is that basket’s own return — not short P&L.
Gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs · not investor results
Every constituent of the long leg — sort, search or filter by sector
| Ticker | Company | Sector | Market cap | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1UAL | UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $36.14B | 15.83% |
2GPN | GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC | Industrials | $23.34B | 10.22% |
3CNH | CNH INDUSTRIAL NV | Industrials | $19.25B | 8.43% |
4QXO | QXO INC | Industrials | $13.29B | 5.82% |
5UHAL | U-HAUL HOLDING CO | Industrials | $10.85B | 4.75% |
6AAL | AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC | Industrials | $8.82B | 3.86% |
7ADT | ADT INC | Industrials | $7.22B | 3.16% |
8GATX | GATX CORP | Industrials | $6.61B | 2.89% |
9BLDR | BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE INC | Industrials | $6.47B | 2.83% |
10GXO | GXO LOGISTICS INC | Industrials | $6.14B | 2.69% |
11HRI | HERC HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $5.57B | 2.44% |
12AMTM | AMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $5.42B | 2.37% |
13CAR | AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC | Industrials | $4.44B | 1.94% |
14ALK | ALASKA AIR GROUP INC | Industrials | $4.40B | 1.93% |
15MDU | MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC | Industrials | $4.17B | 1.83% |
16EQPT | EQUIPMENTSHARECOM INC | Industrials | $3.92B | 1.71% |
17WSC | WILLSCOT HOLDINGS CORP | Industrials | $3.60B | 1.58% |
18SEB | SEABOARD CORP | Industrials | $3.55B | 1.55% |
19ABM | ABM INDUSTRIES INC | Industrials | $3.21B | 1.41% |
20SKYW | SKYWEST INC | Industrials | $3.14B | 1.37% |
21ALGT | ALLEGIANT TRAVEL CO | Industrials | $2.53B | 1.11% |
22TRN | TRINITY INDUSTRIES INC | Industrials | $2.36B | 1.03% |
23TIC | TIC SOLUTIONS INC | Industrials | $2.32B | 1.02% |
24MAN | MANPOWERGROUP INC | Industrials | $2.14B | 0.94% |
25KMT | KENNAMETAL INC | Industrials | $1.87B | 0.82% |
26ULCC | FRONTIER GROUP HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $1.77B | 0.78% |
27WERN | WERNER ENTERPRISES INC | Industrials | $1.66B | 0.73% |
28ENR | ENERGIZER HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $1.66B | 0.72% |
29RYZ | RYERSON HOLDING CORP | Industrials | $1.56B | 0.68% |
30HLMN | HILLMAN SOLUTIONS CORP | Industrials | $1.53B | 0.67% |
31HUBG | HUB GROUP INC | Industrials | $1.49B | 0.65% |
32AMRC | AMERESCO INC | Industrials | $1.38B | 0.60% |
33GBX | GREENBRIER COMPANIES INC | Industrials | $1.30B | 0.57% |
34RHLD | RESOLUTE HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT INC | Industrials | $1.22B | 0.53% |
35WLFC | WILLIS LEASE FINANCE CORP | Industrials | $981M | 0.43% |
36RJET | REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $950M | 0.42% |
37BV | BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $935M | 0.41% |
38ROCK | GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES INC | Industrials | $918M | 0.40% |
39YSS | YORK SPACE SYSTEMS INC | Industrials | $907M | 0.40% |
40CODI | COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS | Industrials | $888M | 0.39% |
41NX | QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP | Industrials | $886M | 0.39% |
42MTW | MANITOWOC CO INC | Industrials | $880M | 0.39% |
43KODK | EASTMAN KODAK CO | Industrials | $834M | 0.37% |
44AEBI | AEBI SCHMIDT HOLDING AG | Industrials | $795M | 0.35% |
45ULH | UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $783M | 0.34% |
46CASS | CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC | Industrials | $708M | 0.31% |
47NVRI | ENVIRI CORP | Industrials | $684M | 0.30% |
48PKOH | PARK OHIO HOLDINGS CORP | Industrials | $679M | 0.30% |
49ITG | ITG INC | Industrials | $658M | 0.29% |
50PANL | PANGAEA LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS LTD | Industrials | $619M | 0.27% |
51CMCO | COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORP | Industrials | $612M | 0.27% |
52MATW | MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP | Industrials | $590M | 0.26% |
53FWRD | FORWARD AIR CORP | Industrials | $579M | 0.25% |
54TITN | TITAN MACHINERY INC | Industrials | $550M | 0.24% |
55BBCP | CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $518M | 0.23% |
56HY | HYSTER-YALE INC | Industrials | $501M | 0.22% |
57BXC | BLUELINX HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $494M | 0.22% |
58ACCO | ACCO BRANDS CORP | Industrials | $494M | 0.22% |
59KE | KIMBALL ELECTRONICS INC | Industrials | $482M | 0.21% |
60KELYA | KELLY SERVICES INC | Industrials | $481M | 0.21% |
61WNC | WABASH NATIONAL CORP | Industrials | $477M | 0.21% |
62EROC | EROCK INC | Industrials | $402M | 0.18% |
63QUAD | QUAD/GRAPHICS INC | Industrials | $384M | 0.17% |
64TBI | TRUEBLUE INC | Industrials | $377M | 0.16% |
65MEC | MAYVILLE ENGINEERING COMPANY INC | Industrials | $357M | 0.16% |
66TWI | TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC | Industrials | $333M | 0.15% |
67ORN | ORION GROUP HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $311M | 0.14% |
68EAF | GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD | Industrials | $298M | 0.13% |
69PAMT | PAMT CORP | Industrials | $298M | 0.13% |
70CDNL | CARDINAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP INC | Industrials | $268M | 0.12% |
71MTRX | MATRIX SERVICE CO | Industrials | $260M | 0.11% |
72ASLE | AERSALE CORP | Industrials | $245M | 0.11% |
73SMHI | SEACOR MARINE HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $237M | 0.10% |
74TG | TREDEGAR CORP | Industrials | $198M | 0.09% |
75ALTG | ALTA EQUIPMENT GROUP INC | Industrials | $186M | 0.08% |
76AIRO | AIRO GROUP HOLDINGS INC | Industrials | $176M | 0.08% |
77RAIL | FREIGHTCAR AMERICA INC | Industrials | $175M | 0.08% |
78FORR | FORRESTER RESEARCH INC | Industrials | $166M | 0.07% |
79AP | AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP | Industrials | $159M | 0.07% |
80HURC | HURCO COMPANIES INC | Industrials | $135M | 0.06% |
81TISI | TEAM INC | Industrials | $107M | 0.05% |
82AIRT | AIR T INC | Industrials | $81M | 0.04% |
Full long-leg book as of November 2026 · cap-weighted · total market cap $228.38B. Hypothetical model holdings — not a registered fund’s portfolio.
Size × value map of the long-leg book
Share of long-leg capital by market cap × book-to-market, using terciles of the 406-name universe at November 2026. Rows: Large ≥ $8.5B, Small < $1.5B. Columns: Value ≥ 0.61, Growth < 0.38 B/M. The dot marks the capital-weighted centroid of the book — 62% toward Large, 40% toward Growth. +26% unclassified (15 missing size/value). Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not realized P&L.
Capital-weighted centroid of the long leg, December 1998 → November 2026; the right-hand end is the same value as the box’s dot. 82 names now. Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not P&L.
How this book measures against the concentration and liquidity rules — as implemented here
These are UNCONSTRAINED factor sleeves: the construction pipeline sorts on a signal and cap-weights the top bucket, applying no issuer cap, no industry cap and no liquidity screen beyond the universe filter. A failing test therefore reports a constraint that was never applied during construction — it is not a defect in the strategy and not an error in the data. The same signal can be solved subject to these constraints.
7 independent checks plus 1 arithmetically implied by another check (RIC / IRC 851(b)(3)(A) 50% bucket), which is reported separately so the tally cannot overstate scrutiny.
1 of 7 checks could not be tested. Those are neither passes nor failures — they are gaps in what the data can answer, and they are excluded from the passed count above rather than folded into it.
Engineering approximation of the cited rules for a DRAFT / HYPOTHETICAL model portfolio that is not a registered fund. This reports whether the portfolio passes the stated test AS IMPLEMENTED HERE; it is not a compliance opinion and is not a statement that any fund is compliant. Real filings need securities counsel.
No verdict sits within 1.0pp of its limit.
Data version — panel=20261113T032607 rows=2198308 asof=202611 issuers=20261113T063725 rates=20261113T063725
Measured on the 2026-11 formation date across 82 holdings (cap-weighted). A different formation date can produce different verdicts.
Whether this long-only book is subject to the VaR tests at all
This assessment describes the long-only book this fund holds — the top bucket only.
This fund QUALIFIES for the limited-derivatives-user exception, so it is excepted from the VaR tests; the ratio below is informational, not the operative limit.
Rule 18f-4(c)(4): a fund whose derivatives exposure (gross notional, including the value of assets sold short) is <= 10% of net assets is excepted from the VaR tests and the full derivatives risk management program.
No confidence interval: this follows from portfolio construction, not from an estimate.
Rule 18f-4(c)(2)(i): fund VaR at 99% over 20 trading days must not exceed 200% of the designated reference portfolio's VaR on the same basis.
Informational — does not governThis fund is excepted from the VaR tests, so the ratio below is context rather than the operative limit. It is shown because it is still a description of the book’s risk, not because it decides anything.
historical method · 335 monthly observations · about 3.4 in the 99% tail · paired percentile bootstrap over months
The estimators disagree about the verdict, not just the value — the choice of method decides the answer here. Historical VaR gives ratio 2.08 (fail) but Gaussian VaR gives 1.70 (pass). The pass/fail conclusion is an artefact of estimator choice, not a property of the strategy.
Engineering approximation of SEC Rule 18f-4 for research display. Not a compliance opinion and not a determination that any fund is compliant. Hypothetical model portfolio, not a registered fund.
The research long-short construction behind this factor does not qualify for this exception — a dollar-neutral book counts its full short notional, which is 100% of net assets against a 10% threshold. This product sidesteps that by holding the long leg alone, which is also why the long-leg Sharpe is reported separately throughout the site.
See the long-short verdict on the factor page →Did the edge survive the paper coming out?
There is no “before” to compare against — the predictor was already public when our data begins, so every month shown is out-of-sample relative to the original study.
Split at January of the year after the factor was published. The post-publication stretch IS genuinely out-of-sample relative to the original study -- the predictor was public by then -- so it speaks to whether the effect survived being known. Nothing is fitted here, so this is performance SINCE PUBLICATION, not validation of a model. Note the 'pre' side is our data before publication (our panel starts ~1999), NOT the study's original in-sample period, which usually ran decades earlier; a decay figure compares before-vs-after within our sample and is not a comparison against the published result.
Is this record broadly durable, or one regime?
3-year rolling windows, stepping 1 year (26 windows). Dispersion is the spread of window Sharpes — higher means the record depends more on which era you look at.
Rules-based factors fit no parameters, so these windows are not out-of-sample tests and do not validate a fitted model. They show whether the factor's record is consistent across eras or driven by one regime.
Long leg is what this fund holds — long-short is shown for reference
| Period | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 1 yearcum. | 28.4% | 15.2% |
| 3 yearsp.a. | 23.0% | 5.3% |
| 5 yearsp.a. | 16.7% | 10.2% |
| 10 yearsp.a. | 9.0% | -0.1% |
| Since inceptionp.a. | 9.2% | 3.1% |
| Year | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 202611 mo | 22.5% | 7.8% |
| 2025 | 6.4% | -6.2% |
| 2024 | 27.9% | 9.7% |
| 2023 | 29.5% | 11.3% |
| 2022 | -4.8% | 27.1% |
| 2021 | 24.7% | 4.9% |
| 2020 | -1.7% | -13.0% |
| 2019 | 40.0% | 13.1% |
| 2018 | -35.4% | -28.7% |
| 2017 | 2.6% | -15.9% |
| 2016 | 38.6% | 16.9% |
| 2015 | 7.9% | 15.3% |
| 2014 | 2.7% | -3.6% |
| 2013 | 45.8% | 7.2% |
| 2012 | 23.9% | 14.1% |
| 2011 | -7.6% | -4.8% |
| 2010 | 23.8% | 0.9% |
| 2009 | 19.0% | 12.2% |
| 2008 | -50.7% | -18.8% |
| 2007 | 3.2% | -6.3% |
| 2006 | 15.8% | 7.5% |
| 2005 | 1.8% | -2.6% |
| 2004 | 25.5% | 9.3% |
| 2003 | 56.6% | 23.1% |
| 2002 | -19.0% | -10.8% |
| 2001 | 8.8% | 22.9% |
| 2000 | 2.7% | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 24.0% | 19.0% |
Long leg = the top bucket this fund holds; long-short additionally shorts the bottom bucket and is not achievable in a long-only vehicle. Trailing figures run through November 2026: 1 year is a plain cumulative 12-month return (cum.), 3 years and longer are annualised (p.a.). Years marked with a month count are partial. These match the fact sheet’s tables by construction. Hypothetical backtest, gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs — not investor results.
The Foundry Industrials AM Factor ETF tracks a rules-based model that ranks Industrials common stocks each month by a AM signal and holds the top quintile with the highest values. Signals are computed from point-in-time Sharadar fundamentals and total-return prices. The portfolio reconstitutes monthly and is cap-weighted within the long leg.
This is a hypothetical model portfolio for research display only — not a registered fund, not an offer, and not investment advice.
Auto-generated from the model’s metrics and current holdings. Every document is labeled DRAFT / hypothetical.
Objective, fees, strategy, and key risks.
Full strategy, model methodology, and risks.
Policies, construction, and governance.
One-page snapshot with top holdings.
Full current constituent list.
DRAFT — HYPOTHETICAL MODEL PORTFOLIO — NOT A REGISTERED FUND, NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.