ETF Foundry Research (hypothetical) · rebalanced monthly
Every other metric on this page is the long-shortstrategy, which needs a short book. This fund is the long leg alone, so these are the figures for what it actually holds. The bottom-bucket number is that basket’s own return — not short P&L.
Gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs · not investor results
Every constituent of the long leg — sort, search or filter by sector
| Ticker | Company | Sector | Market cap | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1TOL | TOLL BROTHERS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $13.64B | 8.02% |
2DECK | DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $11.28B | 6.63% |
3LULU | LULULEMON ATHLETICA INC | Consumer Cyclical | $11.03B | 6.49% |
4NCLH | NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS LTD | Consumer Cyclical | $8.29B | 4.88% |
5ETSY | ETSY INC | Consumer Cyclical | $7.61B | 4.48% |
6GAP | GAP INC | Consumer Cyclical | $7.46B | 4.39% |
7CROX | CROCS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $7.17B | 4.22% |
8LAD | LITHIA MOTORS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $6.42B | 3.78% |
9M | MACY'S INC | Consumer Cyclical | $6.35B | 3.74% |
10HRB | H&R BLOCK INC | Consumer Cyclical | $6.17B | 3.63% |
11AN | AUTONATION INC | Consumer Cyclical | $5.77B | 3.39% |
12BYD | BOYD GAMING CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $5.45B | 3.20% |
13LEA | LEAR CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $5.23B | 3.08% |
14MAT | MATTEL INC | Consumer Cyclical | $4.43B | 2.61% |
15BBWI | BATH & BODY WORKS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $4.25B | 2.50% |
16ASO | ACADEMY SPORTS & OUTDOORS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $4.14B | 2.44% |
17GNTX | GENTEX CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $3.98B | 2.34% |
18GTX | GARRETT MOTION INC | Consumer Cyclical | $3.97B | 2.33% |
19AEO | AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $3.63B | 2.14% |
20ABG | ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC | Consumer Cyclical | $3.58B | 2.11% |
21HGV | HILTON GRAND VACATIONS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $3.33B | 1.96% |
22MHO | M/I HOMES INC | Consumer Cyclical | $3.17B | 1.86% |
23GPI | GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC | Consumer Cyclical | $3.07B | 1.81% |
24KSS | KOHLS CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $2.66B | 1.57% |
25GRBK | GREEN BRICK PARTNERS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $2.58B | 1.52% |
26LCII | LCI INDUSTRIES | Consumer Cyclical | $2.36B | 1.39% |
27DAN | DANA INC | Consumer Cyclical | $2.27B | 1.33% |
28BKE | BUCKLE INC | Consumer Cyclical | $2.26B | 1.33% |
29CPRI | CAPRI HOLDINGS LTD | Consumer Cyclical | $2.11B | 1.24% |
30SAH | SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC | Consumer Cyclical | $1.90B | 1.12% |
31DRVN | DRIVEN BRANDS HOLDINGS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $1.90B | 1.12% |
32BLBD | BLUE BIRD CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $1.76B | 1.03% |
33SBH | SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $1.67B | 0.98% |
34GIII | G III APPAREL GROUP LTD | Consumer Cyclical | $1.35B | 0.79% |
35TRS | TRIMAS CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $1.35B | 0.79% |
36CRI | CARTERS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $1.24B | 0.73% |
37DFH | DREAM FINDERS HOMES INC | Consumer Cyclical | $997M | 0.59% |
38LEGH | LEGACY HOUSING CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $675M | 0.40% |
39CAL | CALERES INC | Consumer Cyclical | $456M | 0.27% |
40CSV | CARRIAGE SERVICES INC | Consumer Cyclical | $443M | 0.26% |
41HBB | HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS HOLDING CO | Consumer Cyclical | $410M | 0.24% |
42RCKY | ROCKY BRANDS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $389M | 0.23% |
43GCO | GENESCO INC | Consumer Cyclical | $387M | 0.23% |
44BBW | BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP INC | Consumer Cyclical | $350M | 0.21% |
45FLXS | FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC | Consumer Cyclical | $313M | 0.18% |
46JACK | JACK IN THE BOX INC | Consumer Cyclical | $270M | 0.16% |
47LE | LANDS' END INC | Consumer Cyclical | $264M | 0.15% |
48LCUT | LIFETIME BRANDS INC | Consumer Cyclical | $177M | 0.10% |
49RGS | REGIS CORP | Consumer Cyclical | $59M | 0.03% |
Full long-leg book as of November 2026 · cap-weighted · total market cap $170.07B. Hypothetical model holdings — not a registered fund’s portfolio.
Size × value map of the long-leg book
Share of long-leg capital by market cap × book-to-market, using terciles of the 302-name universe at November 2026. Rows: Large ≥ $5.8B, Small < $1.3B. Columns: Value ≥ 0.64, Growth < 0.36 B/M. The dot marks the capital-weighted centroid of the book — 75% toward Large, 10% toward Growth. Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not realized P&L.
Capital-weighted centroid of the long leg, December 1998 → November 2026; the right-hand end is the same value as the box’s dot. 49 names now. Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not P&L.
How this book measures against the concentration and liquidity rules — as implemented here
The constraint checks couldn’t be loaded. The service didn’t respond, so this is a gap in what we could fetch — not a statement about the factor.
Reloading the page usually resolves it.
Whether this long-only book is subject to the VaR tests at all
This assessment describes the long-only book this fund holds — the top bucket only.
This fund QUALIFIES for the limited-derivatives-user exception, so it is excepted from the VaR tests; the ratio below is informational, not the operative limit.
Rule 18f-4(c)(4): a fund whose derivatives exposure (gross notional, including the value of assets sold short) is <= 10% of net assets is excepted from the VaR tests and the full derivatives risk management program.
No confidence interval: this follows from portfolio construction, not from an estimate.
Rule 18f-4(c)(2)(i): fund VaR at 99% over 20 trading days must not exceed 200% of the designated reference portfolio's VaR on the same basis.
Informational — does not governThis fund is excepted from the VaR tests, so the ratio below is context rather than the operative limit. It is shown because it is still a description of the book’s risk, not because it decides anything.
historical method · 335 monthly observations · about 3.4 in the 99% tail · paired percentile bootstrap over months
The estimators disagree about the verdict, not just the value — the choice of method decides the answer here. Historical VaR gives ratio 2.17 (fail) but Gaussian VaR gives 1.86 (pass). The pass/fail conclusion is an artefact of estimator choice, not a property of the strategy.
Engineering approximation of SEC Rule 18f-4 for research display. Not a compliance opinion and not a determination that any fund is compliant. Hypothetical model portfolio, not a registered fund.
The research long-short construction behind this factor does not qualify for this exception — a dollar-neutral book counts its full short notional, which is 100% of net assets against a 10% threshold. This product sidesteps that by holding the long leg alone, which is also why the long-leg Sharpe is reported separately throughout the site.
See the long-short verdict on the factor page →Did the edge survive the paper coming out?
There is no “before” to compare against — the predictor was already public when our data begins, so every month shown is out-of-sample relative to the original study.
Split at January of the year after the factor was published. The post-publication stretch IS genuinely out-of-sample relative to the original study -- the predictor was public by then -- so it speaks to whether the effect survived being known. Nothing is fitted here, so this is performance SINCE PUBLICATION, not validation of a model. Note the 'pre' side is our data before publication (our panel starts ~1999), NOT the study's original in-sample period, which usually ran decades earlier; a decay figure compares before-vs-after within our sample and is not a comparison against the published result.
Is this record broadly durable, or one regime?
3-year rolling windows, stepping 1 year (26 windows). Dispersion is the spread of window Sharpes — higher means the record depends more on which era you look at.
Rules-based factors fit no parameters, so these windows are not out-of-sample tests and do not validate a fitted model. They show whether the factor's record is consistent across eras or driven by one regime.
Long leg is what this fund holds — long-short is shown for reference
| Period | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 1 yearcum. | 14.1% | 16.5% |
| 3 yearsp.a. | 21.0% | -1.2% |
| 5 yearsp.a. | 11.7% | 3.8% |
| 10 yearsp.a. | 8.6% | -11.2% |
| Since inceptionp.a. | 10.0% | -2.0% |
| Year | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 202611 mo | 15.8% | 19.3% |
| 2025 | 10.6% | -6.8% |
| 2024 | 19.0% | -22.5% |
| 2023 | 50.9% | 4.1% |
| 2022 | -27.8% | 23.3% |
| 2021 | 38.2% | 16.7% |
| 2020 | -16.6% | -56.7% |
| 2019 | 24.9% | -0.7% |
| 2018 | -23.9% | -38.6% |
| 2017 | 24.8% | -12.0% |
| 2016 | 11.3% | 4.0% |
| 2015 | -10.7% | -9.2% |
| 2014 | 9.5% | 14.0% |
| 2013 | 34.1% | -8.2% |
| 2012 | 27.0% | -1.9% |
| 2011 | -21.3% | -19.2% |
| 2010 | 43.8% | 7.6% |
| 2009 | 75.8% | -7.8% |
| 2008 | -55.3% | 0.4% |
| 2007 | -22.0% | -35.1% |
| 2006 | 1.3% | -8.0% |
| 2005 | -2.8% | 0.2% |
| 2004 | 13.7% | -18.6% |
| 2003 | 101.5% | 51.5% |
| 2002 | -3.3% | 21.0% |
| 2001 | 65.3% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 26.0% | 87.7% |
| 1999 | 7.1% | -13.9% |
Long leg = the top bucket this fund holds; long-short additionally shorts the bottom bucket and is not achievable in a long-only vehicle. Trailing figures run through November 2026: 1 year is a plain cumulative 12-month return (cum.), 3 years and longer are annualised (p.a.). Years marked with a month count are partial. These match the fact sheet’s tables by construction. Hypothetical backtest, gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs — not investor results.
The Foundry Consumer Cyclical Earnings Yield Factor ETF tracks a rules-based model that ranks Consumer Cyclical common stocks each month by a Earnings Yield signal and holds the top quintile with the highest values. Signals are computed from point-in-time Sharadar fundamentals and total-return prices. The portfolio reconstitutes monthly and is cap-weighted within the long leg.
This is a hypothetical model portfolio for research display only — not a registered fund, not an offer, and not investment advice.
Auto-generated from the model’s metrics and current holdings. Every document is labeled DRAFT / hypothetical.
Objective, fees, strategy, and key risks.
Full strategy, model methodology, and risks.
Policies, construction, and governance.
One-page snapshot with top holdings.
Full current constituent list.
DRAFT — HYPOTHETICAL MODEL PORTFOLIO — NOT A REGISTERED FUND, NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.