ETF Foundry Research (hypothetical) · rebalanced monthly
Every other metric on this page is the long-shortstrategy, which needs a short book. This fund is the long leg alone, so these are the figures for what it actually holds. The bottom-bucket number is that basket’s own return — not short P&L.
Gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs · not investor results
Every constituent of the long leg — sort, search or filter by sector
| Ticker | Company | Sector | Market cap | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1MU | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | Technology | $903.37B | 31.68% |
2PLTR | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | Technology | $413.42B | 14.50% |
3CRM | SALESFORCE INC | Technology | $179.06B | 6.28% |
4SNDK | SANDISK CORP | Technology | $133.39B | 4.68% |
5APP | APPLOVIN CORP | Technology | $130.43B | 4.57% |
6FTNT | FORTINET INC | Technology | $95.17B | 3.34% |
7ADBE | ADOBE INC | Technology | $92.84B | 3.26% |
8CDNS | CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $91.46B | 3.21% |
9INTU | INTUIT INC | Technology | $90.91B | 3.19% |
10DDOG | DATADOG INC | Technology | $66.60B | 2.34% |
11ADSK | AUTODESK INC | Technology | $54.23B | 1.90% |
12WDAY | WORKDAY INC | Technology | $45.94B | 1.61% |
13TEAM | ATLASSIAN CORP | Technology | $38.35B | 1.35% |
14OKTA | OKTA INC | Technology | $31.91B | 1.12% |
15ZS | ZSCALER INC | Technology | $31.51B | 1.10% |
16CPAY | CORPAY INC | Technology | $29.17B | 1.02% |
17ZM | ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC | Technology | $28.51B | 1.00% |
18VRSN | VERISIGN INC | Technology | $28.03B | 0.98% |
19IOT | SAMSARA INC | Technology | $24.20B | 0.85% |
20RBRK | RUBRIK INC | Technology | $22.88B | 0.80% |
21PTC | PTC INC | Technology | $21.29B | 0.75% |
22FFIV | F5 INC | Technology | $17.99B | 0.63% |
23GEN | GEN DIGITAL INC | Technology | $17.61B | 0.62% |
24NTNX | NUTANIX INC | Technology | $16.47B | 0.58% |
25FICO | FAIR ISAAC CORP | Technology | $15.34B | 0.54% |
26DOCU | DOCUSIGN INC | Technology | $14.98B | 0.53% |
27FROG | JFROG LTD | Technology | $13.78B | 0.48% |
28BSY | BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $13.36B | 0.47% |
29DT | DYNATRACE INC | Technology | $12.88B | 0.45% |
30CHYM | CHIME FINANCIAL INC | Technology | $12.68B | 0.44% |
31PCOR | PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES INC | Technology | $11.55B | 0.41% |
32PAYC | PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC | Technology | $11.21B | 0.39% |
33HUBS | HUBSPOT INC | Technology | $10.54B | 0.37% |
34FIG | FIGMA INC | Technology | $10.13B | 0.36% |
35RMBS | RAMBUS INC | Technology | $9.10B | 0.32% |
36GTLB | GITLAB INC | Technology | $7.88B | 0.28% |
37DBX | DROPBOX INC | Technology | $7.49B | 0.26% |
38PATH | UIPATH INC | Technology | $6.83B | 0.24% |
39CVLT | COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $6.80B | 0.24% |
40QLYS | QUALYS INC | Technology | $6.04B | 0.21% |
41BOX | BOX INC | Technology | $5.99B | 0.21% |
42VRNS | VARONIS SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $5.66B | 0.20% |
43PEGA | PEGASYSTEMS INC | Technology | $5.24B | 0.18% |
44BILL | BILL HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $4.64B | 0.16% |
45TENB | TENABLE HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $4.29B | 0.15% |
46WK | WORKIVA INC | Technology | $3.73B | 0.13% |
47LIF | LIFE360 INC | Technology | $3.57B | 0.13% |
48INTA | INTAPP INC | Technology | $3.52B | 0.12% |
49DAVE | DAVE INC | Technology | $3.42B | 0.12% |
50FRSH | FRESHWORKS INC | Technology | $3.32B | 0.12% |
51CLBT | CELLEBRITE DI LTD | Technology | $2.70B | 0.09% |
52NTCT | NETSCOUT SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $2.31B | 0.08% |
53ASAN | ASANA INC | Technology | $2.21B | 0.08% |
54DV | DOUBLEVERIFY HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $2.12B | 0.07% |
55ATEN | A10 NETWORKS INC | Technology | $2.11B | 0.07% |
56ADEA | ADEIA INC | Technology | $1.84B | 0.06% |
57PRGS | PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP | Technology | $1.78B | 0.06% |
58BL | BLACKLINE INC | Technology | $1.63B | 0.06% |
59WLTH | WEALTHFRONT CORP | Technology | $1.59B | 0.06% |
60IBTA | IBOTTA INC | Technology | $1.36B | 0.05% |
61SECZ | SECURITIZE CORP | Technology | $1.30B | 0.05% |
62PD | PAGERDUTY INC | Technology | $1.24B | 0.04% |
63EVCM | EVERCOMMERCE INC | Technology | $1.23B | 0.04% |
64RDVT | RED VIOLET INC | Technology | $1.22B | 0.04% |
65AIP | ARTERIS INC | Technology | $1.00B | 0.04% |
66DJCO | DAILY JOURNAL CORP | Technology | $914M | 0.03% |
67MITK | MITEK SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $824M | 0.03% |
68CCSI | CONSENSUS CLOUD SOLUTIONS INC | Technology | $771M | 0.03% |
69DSP | VIANT TECHNOLOGY INC | Technology | $760M | 0.03% |
70CEVA | CEVA INC | Technology | $751M | 0.03% |
71SPT | SPROUT SOCIAL INC | Technology | $678M | 0.02% |
72BRUN | BOOST RUN INC | Technology | $471M | 0.02% |
73NVEC | NVE CORP | Technology | $400M | 0.01% |
74CRNC | CERENCE INC | Technology | $369M | 0.01% |
75MKTW | MARKETWISE INC | Technology | $350M | 0.01% |
76SVCO | SILVACO GROUP INC | Technology | $255M | 0.01% |
77AEYE | AUDIOEYE INC | Technology | $181M | 0.01% |
78TRAK | REPOSITRAK INC | Technology | $134M | 0.00% |
Full long-leg book as of November 2026 · cap-weighted · total market cap $2.85T. Hypothetical model holdings — not a registered fund’s portfolio.
Size × value map of the long-leg book
Share of long-leg capital by market cap × book-to-market, using terciles of the 394-name universe at November 2026. Rows: Large ≥ $10B, Small < $2.2B. Columns: Value ≥ 0.64, Growth < 0.35 B/M. The dot marks the capital-weighted centroid of the book — 98% toward Large, 43% toward Growth. +1% unclassified (6 missing size/value). Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not realized P&L.
Capital-weighted centroid of the long leg, December 1998 → November 2026; the right-hand end is the same value as the box’s dot. 78 names now. Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not P&L.
How this book measures against the concentration and liquidity rules — as implemented here
These are UNCONSTRAINED factor sleeves: the construction pipeline sorts on a signal and cap-weights the top bucket, applying no issuer cap, no industry cap and no liquidity screen beyond the universe filter. A failing test therefore reports a constraint that was never applied during construction — it is not a defect in the strategy and not an error in the data. The same signal can be solved subject to these constraints.
7 independent checks plus 1 arithmetically implied by another check (RIC / IRC 851(b)(3)(A) 50% bucket), which is reported separately so the tally cannot overstate scrutiny.
1 of 7 checks could not be tested. Those are neither passes nor failures — they are gaps in what the data can answer, and they are excluded from the passed count above rather than folded into it.
With respect to 75% of total assets, no more than 5% may be invested in the securities of any one issuer.
No more than 25% of total assets may be invested in the securities of any one issuer.
Engineering approximation of the cited rules for a DRAFT / HYPOTHETICAL model portfolio that is not a registered fund. This reports whether the portfolio passes the stated test AS IMPLEMENTED HERE; it is not a compliance opinion and is not a statement that any fund is compliant. Real filings need securities counsel.
No verdict sits within 1.0pp of its limit.
Data version — panel=20261113T032607 rows=2198308 asof=202611 issuers=20261113T063725 rates=20261113T063725
Measured on the 2026-11 formation date across 78 holdings (cap-weighted). A different formation date can produce different verdicts.
Whether this long-only book is subject to the VaR tests at all
This assessment describes the long-only book this fund holds — the top bucket only.
This fund QUALIFIES for the limited-derivatives-user exception, so it is excepted from the VaR tests; the ratio below is informational, not the operative limit.
Rule 18f-4(c)(4): a fund whose derivatives exposure (gross notional, including the value of assets sold short) is <= 10% of net assets is excepted from the VaR tests and the full derivatives risk management program.
No confidence interval: this follows from portfolio construction, not from an estimate.
Rule 18f-4(c)(2)(i): fund VaR at 99% over 20 trading days must not exceed 200% of the designated reference portfolio's VaR on the same basis.
Informational — does not governThis fund is excepted from the VaR tests, so the ratio below is context rather than the operative limit. It is shown because it is still a description of the book’s risk, not because it decides anything.
historical method · 335 monthly observations · about 3.4 in the 99% tail · paired percentile bootstrap over months
The estimators agree, which is mild evidence the number isn’t an artefact of one method.
Engineering approximation of SEC Rule 18f-4 for research display. Not a compliance opinion and not a determination that any fund is compliant. Hypothetical model portfolio, not a registered fund.
The research long-short construction behind this factor does not qualify for this exception — a dollar-neutral book counts its full short notional, which is 100% of net assets against a 10% threshold. This product sidesteps that by holding the long leg alone, which is also why the long-leg Sharpe is reported separately throughout the site.
See the long-short verdict on the factor page →Did the edge survive the paper coming out?
Publication date unknown. We don’t have a source year for this signal, so we can’t split its record into before and since publication. That’s a gap in our reference data — not a statement about how the factor performed.
Split at January of the year after the factor was published. The post-publication stretch IS genuinely out-of-sample relative to the original study -- the predictor was public by then -- so it speaks to whether the effect survived being known. Nothing is fitted here, so this is performance SINCE PUBLICATION, not validation of a model. Note the 'pre' side is our data before publication (our panel starts ~1999), NOT the study's original in-sample period, which usually ran decades earlier; a decay figure compares before-vs-after within our sample and is not a comparison against the published result.
Is this record broadly durable, or one regime?
3-year rolling windows, stepping 1 year (26 windows). Dispersion is the spread of window Sharpes — higher means the record depends more on which era you look at.
Rules-based factors fit no parameters, so these windows are not out-of-sample tests and do not validate a fitted model. They show whether the factor's record is consistent across eras or driven by one regime.
Long leg is what this fund holds — long-short is shown for reference
| Period | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 1 yearcum. | -10.5% | -56.5% |
| 3 yearsp.a. | 3.9% | -26.3% |
| 5 yearsp.a. | -0.2% | -16.7% |
| 10 yearsp.a. | 14.5% | -4.3% |
| Since inceptionp.a. | 7.5% | -0.7% |
| Year | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 202611 mo | -14.0% | -57.7% |
| 2025 | 5.2% | -9.6% |
| 2024 | 17.5% | 8.4% |
| 2023 | 54.4% | 17.3% |
| 2022 | -36.2% | -13.2% |
| 2021 | 18.4% | 10.8% |
| 2020 | 51.9% | 13.5% |
| 2019 | 32.4% | -3.5% |
| 2018 | 16.8% | 23.5% |
| 2017 | 36.8% | 7.4% |
| 2016 | 9.2% | -14.0% |
| 2015 | -2.5% | 6.6% |
| 2014 | 18.3% | -6.7% |
| 2013 | 30.2% | -26.5% |
| 2012 | 15.8% | 22.4% |
| 2011 | -11.2% | 9.7% |
| 2010 | 18.8% | 25.0% |
| 2009 | 50.3% | -1.7% |
| 2008 | -38.6% | 7.2% |
| 2007 | 16.9% | 7.7% |
| 2006 | 12.9% | -5.1% |
| 2005 | -3.7% | -10.6% |
| 2004 | 5.0% | -3.7% |
| 2003 | 27.3% | -14.0% |
| 2002 | -27.4% | 11.2% |
| 2001 | -16.3% | -6.8% |
| 2000 | -51.3% | -3.1% |
| 1999 | 100.6% | 43.9% |
Long leg = the top bucket this fund holds; long-short additionally shorts the bottom bucket and is not achievable in a long-only vehicle. Trailing figures run through November 2026: 1 year is a plain cumulative 12-month return (cum.), 3 years and longer are annualised (p.a.). Years marked with a month count are partial. These match the fact sheet’s tables by construction. Hypothetical backtest, gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs — not investor results.
The Foundry Technology Gross Margin Factor ETF tracks a rules-based model that ranks Technology common stocks each month by a Gross Margin signal and holds the top quintile with the highest values. Signals are computed from point-in-time Sharadar fundamentals and total-return prices. The portfolio reconstitutes monthly and is cap-weighted within the long leg.
This is a hypothetical model portfolio for research display only — not a registered fund, not an offer, and not investment advice.
Auto-generated from the model’s metrics and current holdings. Every document is labeled DRAFT / hypothetical.
Objective, fees, strategy, and key risks.
Full strategy, model methodology, and risks.
Policies, construction, and governance.
One-page snapshot with top holdings.
Full current constituent list.
DRAFT — HYPOTHETICAL MODEL PORTFOLIO — NOT A REGISTERED FUND, NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.